![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Burns
and Old Jamaica
100 years
ago, a Burns enthusiast and traveler wrote the following, which appeared
in the Burns Chronicle of 1903. |
|
BURNS'S
JAMAICA CONNECTIONS.
WHEN in Jamaica during the early part
of this year I visited Port?Antonio, where Burns had engaged to go to
during his dark days in 1786. I was the guest of a Scotsman from the Clyde
district, who is one of the managing staff of the United Fruit Company,
the gigantic trust which controls the fruit trade from the West Indies
and Central America to the Eastern States of America. Among other places,
he took me a very rough ride to a house belonging to him on the hill overlooking
Port?Antonio, which commanded a magnificent view of the fine harbour and
the Caribbean Sea on one hand, and of the Blue Mountain range on the other.
This was Springbank, to which, it is understood, Burns was coming out
in 1786. By this is meant that it was the site of the Great House (the
name given in those days to My Scottish host, the present proprietor of this house, referred me to a half?coloured man in the village named Aubrey Steele Hoyes, a grandson of John Steele, who was apparently proprietor of Springbank in succession to Charles Douglas, the planter whom Burns engaged to come out to. Hoyes showed me various documents of Steele's, among others an interesting general sketch of parish tax and parish road rolls for the parish of Portland (in which Port?Antonio is) in 1809, showing that for taxation purposes slaves in those days were put very much on the level of beasts of burden. For parish tax the 7688 slaves in the parish were assessed at 2s. 9d. each, and the stock at is. 6d. each. At Kingston I referred, along with Mr. Frank Cundall, secretary of the Institute of Jamaica, to the Jamaica Almanacs. The issue for 1811 is the first giving a list of properties, and in this list John Steele is given as proprietor of Springbank, owning 65 slaves and 28 stock, the largest owner in the parish having 454 slaves. The editor of the Daily Gleaner, at Kingston, who is a Scotsman, showed me data collected by him in connection with the matter. Mr. Charles Douglas, to whom Burns engaged himself through his brother, Dr. Patrick Douglas, of Ayr, was the owner of at least two sugar properties in the parish of Portland?viz., Ayr Mount and Nightingale Grove. The former was the principal estate, and lay about three miles from Port?Antonio. The Great House commanded a beautiful view, and, although some details of scenery have since changed, the general aspect remains as it was then. The works, of course, are in ruin. The fields of cane have vanished, and instead there are the cultivations of small settlers, with thatched cottages embowered among fruit trees, but the outline of forest and field, the wealth of vegetation, the brilliancy of colour characteristic of this wet parish have never altered. The Rio Grande, the most romantic of Jamaica streams, still winds quietly along after its wild descent from the Blue Mountains, whose lofty ranges tower immediately behind. The estate now comprises only 4o acres, which are divided among one family of Negroes. Nightingale Grove was further inland, and has now become merged in Golden Vale, the largest banana plantation in the country. The soil of both properties is extremely fertile, and in Burns's time must have yielded golden crops of canes. Port?Antonio was the shipping place, and counted only some 3o houses. There were about 100 other settlements of various kinds, but the sugar estates were the chief centres of industry, and were in themselves small villages. Of these not one now remains. Mr. Douglas appears to have personally managed his estates, which were well looked after, and were well stocked with cattle and slaves. He was one of four superintendents of the Maroon Negro towns established in the island. That under his direction was Moore Town, built on an almost inaccessible ridge of the Blue Mountains, and for his services he was paid £200 per annum. This was the only public office he held, so far as contemporary records show. Burns had signed a contract to serve as a bookkeeper for a term of three years at a salary of £30, with board and lodgings free. It is questionable, according to this informant, whether he realised the exact nature of the work he would be required to do. A bookkeeper then, as now, did not keep books; his duties were to supervise labour in the field and in the boiling and still?houses. On all estates there were three gangs in the fields, one consisting of men, another of women, and the third of children. These toiled from sunrise to sunset, and often at night when the moon shone full. It was the duty of the bookkeeper to follow them and superintend their work in all weathers, and to make them fulfil their apportioned tasks by the free use of the whip. The Slave Act enforced in 1786, not only legalised this practice, but sanctioned the infliction of terrible penalties for the most trivial offences, mutilations, dismemberment, branding, &c. Bookkeepers were not expected to marry, and were often forbidden to do so, but were encouraged to take "° housekeepers " from amongst the slave women. They lived, as a rule, in comfortless barracks exposed to the malarious influences so common around sugar?works, and totally devoid of the refinement most of them were accustomed to in Scotland. The death registers of the colony indicate that 90 per cent. of the young white men who went out as employees on estates succumbed to the effects of imprudence and intemperate living. After the first shock of contact they were able to lose the fine sense of moral responsibility acquired in their Scottish homes, and were tempted to spend their scanty leisure time in low debauchery. It may be concluded that if Burns had fully realised the nature of his prospective work he would never have agreed to place himself under the tyranny of a system so degrading. The editor of the Daily Telegraph, of Kingston,
also a Scotsman, had the official records at Spanish Town searched by
Mr. Judah, one of the officials there, as to the various Douglasses living
in the island in 1786, and furnished me with the following resultant data
:- Third - Charles Douglas, of the parish of Vere,
gentleman, whose will is dated 1842. He mentions his father, William Douglas,
and his mother, Janet Douglas, of the town of Falkirk, Scotland, to each
of whom he bequeathed ,£100, also £100 to his sister, Anne
Miller, of the town of Elgin, Scotland, and a similar amount to another
sister, Margaret Lawson, of the town of Falkirk. It will be seen from
Wallace's edition of " Chambers's Life of Burns" that Janet
Douglas (niece of No. 1), who succeeded her father, Dr. Patrick Douglas,
in Garallan, married fir. Hamilton?Boswell, of Knockroom, collector of
taxes for Ayrshire, and that Mr. Hamilton Douglas Boswell, great grandson
of Dr. Patrick Douglas, succeeded later as proprietor of Garallan. It might be interesting to speculate what would
have been the result had Burns gone to Jamaica. Would he have been dragged
down by the degrading associations of a bookkeeper's life, or would he
have risen superior to his surroundings ? The natural situation of the
estate, as has been indicated, is unusually fine, the views of mountain,
river, and sea being magnificent. This would no doubt have quickened Burns's
inborn love of nature, and would have stimulated his genius in that direction.
|